Buying guide

HOKA Bondi 9 vs Clifton 10: A Podiatrist Reads Both Spec Sheets

Most people are told the Bondi is the cushioned one and the Clifton is the light one. On the published and independently measured numbers, the Clifton has the taller heel, the softer midsole and the wider toe box — while being 28 g lighter and $20 cheaper.

We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, including Amazon links paid by brand partners through Levanta, at no cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How we make money

By Tom Biernacki, DPM, FACFASDouble board-certified foot & ankle surgeonUpdated 17 Sep 2026
Spec comparison — neither shoe tested by us yet

Neither shoe has been under our caliper, so neither is scored. Every figure below is HOKA’s or an independent lab’s, labelled. What testing means here.

Not scoredUntested

The numbers, side by side

Model versions: the Brooks Ghost 17 and HOKA Clifton 10 named on this page have since been superseded. The current models are the Brooks Ghost 18 and HOKA Clifton 11. Nothing here has been swapped to the newer versions — this page describes the models it was built on, and each newer model has its own review.

HOKA Bondi 9 vs Clifton 10. Lab figures from the RunRepeat cut-in-half tests. No number here was measured by us.
MeasurementBondi 9Clifton 10What it means
Heel stack lab41.3 mm44.4 mmThe Clifton is the taller shoe, not the Bondi
Forefoot stack lab32.2 mm32.0 mmEffectively identical underfoot at the ball
Drop, stated HOKA5 mm8 mmWhat the box says
Drop, measured lab9.1 mm12.4 mmBoth are wrong, both in the same direction
Weight lab303 g275 gClifton is 28 g lighter
Midsole softness lab43.0 Asker C34.2 Asker CLower is softer — the Clifton is the plusher of the two
Toe box, widest lab94.1 mm97.2 mmClifton is roomier across the forefoot
Toe box, at big toe lab72.5 mm73.1 mmClose, slight edge to the Clifton
Widths HOKANarrow–X-WideNarrow–X-Wide (men)Both accommodate a wide foot
MSRP HOKA$170$150
Both spec sheets are wrong, and in the same direction. HOKA publishes 5 mm for the Bondi and 8 mm for the Clifton. Independently measured, they are 9.1 mm and 12.4 mm. Whatever the cause, the practical effect is the same: both shoes sit the heel higher than the box claims, which changes who they suit.

What a foot and ankle surgeon takes from this

The received wisdom is backwards on three of the four figures that matter. The Clifton is usually sold as the lighter, firmer, more responsive shoe and the Bondi as the plush one. Measured, the Clifton has 3 mm more heel, a midsole nearly nine points softer on the Asker C scale, and a wider forefoot — and it is lighter and cheaper. On paper the Clifton wins almost every axis.

Where the Bondi still earns its place is firmness under load. A softer midsole is not automatically better. At 43.0 Asker C the Bondi is the firmer platform, and for a heavier runner, a long day standing, or anyone who feels unstable on a tall soft stack, firmer is usually steadier. Soft foam under a 44 mm heel is a lot of shoe to balance on.

The drop question is the one to actually decide on. A measured 12.4 mm (Clifton) unloads the Achilles and plantar fascia more than a measured 9.1 mm (Bondi), and pushes correspondingly more load onto the forefoot. If your problem is heel pain or an insertional Achilles, the Clifton’s geometry is the friendlier of the two. If your problem is under the ball of the foot — metatarsalgia, a neuroma, sesamoiditis — the Bondi’s lower measured drop is the safer pick, and neither is as low as HOKA claims.

How I would choose between them

  • Heel pain, plantar fasciitis, insertional Achilles → Clifton 10. Higher measured drop, taller heel, softer landing. Based on the published geometry, not on wear.
  • Forefoot pain → Bondi 9. Lower measured drop keeps marginally less load forward, and the firmer midsole gives a more predictable platform. Based on the published geometry, not on wear.
  • Bunion, hammertoe, or a wide forefoot → Clifton 10. 97.2 mm at the widest point against 94.1, and both offer wide and extra-wide.
  • Heavier body weight, or you feel unsteady → Bondi 9. Firmer foam under a slightly lower stack is the more stable of the two.
  • Neither, if you were sold on a low drop. Both measure materially higher than stated. Ask for a shoe whose drop has been measured, not quoted.

What we cannot tell you until we test them

Neither pair has been under our caliper. We cannot give you our own internal toe-box depth, we cannot tell you whether a custom orthotic seats in either without heel slip, and we cannot score comfort from a spec sheet. When we test them, both pages become scored reviews and this comparison is rebuilt from our own numbers.

Read the full analysis of each

HOKA Bondi 9

Firmer, heavier, lower measured drop. The steadier platform of the two.

9.1 mm drop (independently measured)

HOKA Clifton 10

Taller, softer, wider, lighter and cheaper. Better for heel pain.

12.4 mm drop (independently measured)

Brooks Ghost 17

If you want a spec sheet that survived measurement, this is the one.

10.4 mm drop (independently measured)

Where to buy — Bondi 9 $170, Clifton 10 $150 at MSRP. Amazon pricing varies by size, colourway and seller; last checked 3 September 2026. We have tested neither shoe.

Women’s HOKA Bondi 9 — check price on Amazon Men’s HOKA Bondi 9 — check price on Amazon Women’s HOKA Clifton 10 — check price on Amazon Men’s HOKA Clifton 10 — check price on Amazon

Podiatrist Tested is reader-supported. We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no additional cost to you. Commissions never influence a score or a ranking, and we publish shoes we recommend against. Read the editorial policy.

Watch: Do Maximalist Running Shoes Offer The Best Arch Support?The maximalist question behind both shoes: does a tall stack deliver support.Michigan Foot Doctors · general education, not a diagnosis · editorial policy
Sourced, not guessed

Recently reviewed

Individual shoe pages state their evidence tier, published measurements and who should skip them.

Saucony

Saucony Endorphin Speed 5

Spec Analysis

Light plated neutral trainer. Saucony publishes both stack heights and they match its 8 mm drop — not yet tested.

$175Not scoredRegular / Wide
HOKA

HOKA Mach 6

Spec Analysis

Lower, firmer neutral HOKA. HOKA publishes a 5 mm drop and neither stack height — not yet tested.

Not scored
ASICS

ASICS Novablast 5

Spec Analysis

Bouncy high-stack neutral. ASICS publishes an 8 mm drop and neither stack height — not yet tested.

Not scoredStandard / Wide / Extra Wide

All reviews

Our funding and evidence policy

We earn affiliate commissions from qualifying purchases. Our policy is to assess published evidence and fit needs rather than rank products by commission rate. Current reviews are specification analyses; see our method for their limits.