Buying guide

HOKA Bondi 9 vs Clifton 10: A Podiatrist Reads Both Spec Sheets

Most people are told the Bondi is the cushioned one and the Clifton is the light one. On the published and independently measured numbers, the Clifton has the taller heel, the softer midsole and the wider toe box — while being 28 g lighter and $20 cheaper.

By Tom Biernacki, DPM, FACFASDouble board-certified foot & ankle surgeonUpdated 7 Sep 2026
Spec comparison — neither shoe tested by us yet

Neither shoe has been under our caliper, so neither is scored. Every figure below is HOKA’s or an independent lab’s, labelled. What testing means here.

Not scoredUntested

The numbers, side by side

HOKA Bondi 9 vs Clifton 10. Lab figures from the RunRepeat cut-in-half tests. No number here was measured by us.
Measurement Bondi 9 Clifton 10 What it means
Heel stack lab 41.3 mm 44.4 mm The Clifton is the taller shoe, not the Bondi
Forefoot stack lab 32.2 mm 32.0 mm Effectively identical underfoot at the ball
Drop, stated HOKA 5 mm 8 mm What the box says
Drop, measured lab 9.1 mm 12.4 mm Both are wrong, both in the same direction
Weight lab 303 g 275 g Clifton is 28 g lighter
Midsole softness lab 43.0 Asker C 34.2 Asker C Lower is softer — the Clifton is the plusher of the two
Toe box, widest lab 94.1 mm 97.2 mm Clifton is roomier across the forefoot
Toe box, at big toe lab 72.5 mm 73.1 mm Close, slight edge to the Clifton
Widths HOKA Narrow–X-Wide Narrow–X-Wide (men) Both accommodate a wide foot
MSRP HOKA $170 $150
Both spec sheets are wrong, and in the same direction. HOKA publishes 5 mm for the Bondi and 8 mm for the Clifton. Independently measured, they are 9.1 mm and 12.4 mm. Whatever the cause, the practical effect is the same: both shoes sit the heel higher than the box claims, which changes who they suit.

What a foot and ankle surgeon takes from this

The received wisdom is backwards on three of the four figures that matter. The Clifton is usually sold as the lighter, firmer, more responsive shoe and the Bondi as the plush one. Measured, the Clifton has 3 mm more heel, a midsole nearly nine points softer on the Asker C scale, and a wider forefoot — and it is lighter and cheaper. On paper the Clifton wins almost every axis.

Where the Bondi still earns its place is firmness under load. A softer midsole is not automatically better. At 43.0 Asker C the Bondi is the firmer platform, and for a heavier runner, a long day standing, or anyone who feels unstable on a tall soft stack, firmer is usually steadier. Soft foam under a 44 mm heel is a lot of shoe to balance on.

The drop question is the one to actually decide on. A measured 12.4 mm (Clifton) unloads the Achilles and plantar fascia more than a measured 9.1 mm (Bondi), and pushes correspondingly more load onto the forefoot. If your problem is heel pain or an insertional Achilles, the Clifton’s geometry is the friendlier of the two. If your problem is under the ball of the foot — metatarsalgia, a neuroma, sesamoiditis — the Bondi’s lower measured drop is the safer pick, and neither is as low as HOKA claims.

How I would choose between them

  • Heel pain, plantar fasciitis, insertional Achilles → Clifton 10. Higher measured drop, taller heel, softer landing. Based on the published geometry, not on wear.
  • Forefoot pain → Bondi 9. Lower measured drop keeps marginally less load forward, and the firmer midsole gives a more predictable platform. Based on the published geometry, not on wear.
  • Bunion, hammertoe, or a wide forefoot → Clifton 10. 97.2 mm at the widest point against 94.1, and both offer wide and extra-wide.
  • Heavier body weight, or you feel unsteady → Bondi 9. Firmer foam under a slightly lower stack is the more stable of the two.
  • Neither, if you were sold on a low drop. Both measure materially higher than stated. Ask for a shoe whose drop has been measured, not quoted.

What we cannot tell you until we test them

Neither pair has been under our caliper. We cannot give you our own internal toe-box depth, we cannot tell you whether a custom orthotic seats in either without heel slip, and we cannot score comfort from a spec sheet. When we test them, both pages become scored reviews and this comparison is rebuilt from our own numbers.

Read the full analysis of each

HOKA Bondi 9

Firmer, heavier, lower measured drop. The steadier platform of the two.

9.1 mm drop (independently measured)

HOKA Clifton 10

Taller, softer, wider, lighter and cheaper. Better for heel pain.

12.4 mm drop (independently measured)

Brooks Ghost 17

If you want a spec sheet that survived measurement, this is the one.

10.4 mm drop (independently measured)

Where to buy — Bondi 9 $170, Clifton 10 $150 at MSRP. Amazon pricing varies by size, colourway and seller; last checked 3 September 2026. We have tested neither shoe.

Check Bondi 9 price on Amazon Check Clifton 10 price on Amazon

Podiatrist Tested is reader-supported. We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no additional cost to you. Commissions never influence a score or a ranking, and we publish shoes we recommend against. Read the editorial policy.

Measured, not guessed

Recently reviewed

Individual shoe pages state their evidence tier, published measurements and who should skip them.

New Balance

New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6

Spec Analysis

New Balance's tallest shoe, 38 mm forefoot, 4 mm drop, APMA seal — not yet tested.

$159.99Not scoredM: D/2E/4E · W: B/D/2E
ASICS

ASICS GEL-CUMULUS 28

Spec Analysis

Light neutral gel trainer, 8 mm drop, 4E available at $145 — not yet tested.

$145Not scoredM/W: Standard, 2E, 4E
Saucony

Saucony Ride 19

Spec Analysis

Light neutral daily trainer, 8 mm drop, wider base than the 18 — not yet tested.

$144.95Not scoredM: D/2E · W: B/D

All reviews

Measured, worn, scored — never sponsored

No brand has ever paid for a review, a score, a ranking or the seal. Where we earn a commission the link says so, and the score does not change.